Arianna Stancari Essays - Pop Ballads, British Musicians, Music

Arianna Stancari Ms. Wedemeyer ENG 101.922 26 June 2018 "Praying for Time": A Plea for Awareness George Michael released "Praying for Time" in 1990 off of his album Listen Without Prejudice. After almost a decade of teeny bop hits and a happy-go-lucky image, the content of this album was a surprise to many of Michael's fans; the album consisted entirely of deeply personal and reflective songs. One of the most remembered and referenced songs is "Praying for Time" because of its important message about society's failure to recognize and adjust its wrongdoings towards the unwealthy. When listening to the song, it is clear that George Michael put a lot of thought into the details: he uses many musical, recording, and lyrical techniques to get his message across. The song opens with the muffled sound of guitars "crashing" into their parts. This immediately gives the song a scared and desperate feeling. The slow tempo that the song maintains throughout allows the listener to really pay attention to the lyrics. Musically, it seems that George Michael didn't want to incorporate anything too extravagant in fear that it would distract from the song's message. The timbre of the song is also generally low; this adds to the song's somber and melancholy quality, evoking in the listener a feeling of sadness or hopelessness. Even in these first few seconds of the song, in which George Michael has not even begun to sing the words, the overall emotion of the song is clear. When Michael does begin to sing, he used recording technologies to make his voice sound as if it were coming out of a radio. I thought that this was a really clever and effective tactic. The song serves as a warning that society has lost compassion, and the idea of these words comi ng out of a radio further drives the image of this song being meant as a warning. Another quality of George Michael's vocals in the song is the way he often whisper-sings during the verses. This helps convey an ominous and melancholy atmosphere. During the choruses, as the words become angrier and more passionate, his vocals grow from those soft whispers to loud, desperate singing. Many who have listened to this song say that this vocal performance seems to "echo the fuzzed vocal texture of John Lennon's Imagine'" (Holden 1990). Its similarities to the vocal and musical styles of late-1960s singers help establish "Praying for Time" as a form of protest and social commentary. George Michael's poetic and powerful lyrics are the main tool used to convey his message. The song is not targeted at a specific group; Michael is commenting on the fact that all of society has lost its sense of compassion towards those who are less fortunate. This means that he is targeting anyone who will listen. In the first verse, Michael speaks directly to the listener: "Look around now," he says. With these words, he calls us to pay attention to our environment and be aware of our actions. Michael also wants to bring to the light the severe separation between rich and poor that has increasingly solidified over time. He says, "The rich declare themselves poor, and most of us are not sure if we have too much." In these lines, he is showing that, when the rich are only surrounded by the rich as a result of this separation, they begin to forget their blessings and compare themselves to each other. This comparison leads to a false idea of what being poor means. The wealthy t hen tend to be unaware of the pain and suffering of the poor; to show that most of society has acquired an "it's every man for himself" mentality, George Michael uses the lines: "So you scream from behind your door Say, What's mine is mine and not yours' I may have too much but I'll take my chances 'Cause God's stopped keeping score" He shows that many of us are so focused on our own successes that we are oblivious to the successes and failures of others. Michael states in his lyrics that God "turned his back, and all God's children crept out the back door." This line is one

Case Brief

Case Brief Brendan FulcherCase Brief 2Tor Wynn8 May 2013Case Brief 2This crime occurred on October 5, 1983. A man and his significant other (who occupy the same house) ate dinner together, and then met at a pool hall at separate times. The woman arrived first, when the man (also the defendant) arrived he saw his significant other talking to another man, he was angry because he thought that she was cheating on him. He states that the anger quickly subsided. He left the bar alone and walked home, 10 minutes later she arrived at their shared residence and told him that he had one week to find another place to live. He consented and went upstairs to change. She followed him and proceeded to attempt to choke him. He punched her in the face in order to force her to release him. She then told him that he needed to leave that night.Deutsch: Messerbnkechen (versilbert) mit Messer ...He said he was tired of her antics, but proceeded to get re dressed and follow her out of the room and in to the kitchen. When he entered the kitchen she swung a 9in long knife at him. He wrestled the knife out of her hands, he has stated that he could have left then, but she grabbed for the knife again, in the struggle the man states that she pulled the knife towards herself, when he pulled the knife away there was blood on the blade. She had stabbed herself in the struggle for the knife.The man was convicted of manslaughter; he argues that it was self-defense and that the jury was not properly instructed on the stand your ground ruling in self-defense. The jury says that since he had an opportunity to get away, that deadly force was not needed,

Intellectual Property Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Intellectual Property Law - Essay Example This essay explores that there are three sets of secnarios where trade mark can be considered to be infringed under â€Å"section 10 of the 1994 Trade markts Act. â€Å" †¢ Where a plaintiff(P) establish that the defendant (D) is employing an analogues sign for analogues products or services – Article 5 1(a) / Section 10(1) . †¢ Where P can establish that D is employing a similar or analogues sign as regards to similar or analogues products or services and hence , it may result in confusion among consumers. Article 5 1(b) / Section 10(2) †¢ Where P establish that D is employing a similar or analgoues sign and this result in unfair benefit of P’s mark or injuring its repute or disitncitve character withoud due cause. Article 5.2 / Section 10(3). In â€Å"L’Oreal v Bellure† case, the main issue was that whether â€Å"look-alike† scents and pack marketed by the defendants violated the registered signs owned by the plaintiff under section 10(3) of the Trade Marks Act of 1994. In this case both UKs High Court and CJEU found that some of the scent bottles and packaging employed for ‘look-alike† perfumes contravened the registered trade marks as the defendant enjoyed an unjust benefit of the reputation or character of the registered trade marks. The court observed that the magnitude of the resemblance was intentional. The defendant attempted to â€Å"wink at† the premium brand’s packaging. The scents preferred as comparativeness, which were famous brands due to their extensive advertisement. (Horton 2011). The defendant by infringing the perfumes derived advantages from such advertisement and sponsorship of the expensive perfumes. Thus, the benefit for the expenses incurred for sponsoring, maintaining and improving a specific trade mark has been enjoyed by the defendants. This results in â€Å"free raiding â€Å"and thus amounting in enjoyment of unfair benefit. (Horton 2011). In Google France v Louis Vuitton and Interflora Inc, three respondents alleged that usage of trade marks, especially in the AdWords service by Google was itself a contravention. It was alleged that the entry of their trade mark names by the users of the internet in the search engine of the Google which activated the display under the caption â€Å"sponsored links† of connection to, as regards to Vuitton, sites presenting replication of products of Vuitton and as regards to Thonet and Viaticum, of connecting to the trade marks of their respective competitors. In each case , the row begun fr om the usage , as keywords in reference service of the internet , of marks which match up to trade marks , without approval from the owners of these trade marks. Before ECJ, the distinct question was that whether Google can bank upon the exemption under Article 14 of Directive 2000/31, which offers exemption for hosting for â€Å"information society services,† CJEU remitted the case back to the domestic court and held that the usage of trade marks by Google in the AdWords service could not be regarded as an infringement. (Roncaglia & Sironi 2011:170). In L’Oreal case, the main focus was on the commercial benefits derived by the defendants instead of damages to the business of the trade mark owner. There is no necessary to establish any harm or confusion among consumers, the business rivals might still derived advantages from the substantial investment made by the trade mark owner in establishing his brand in the market. Thus, the plaintiff has to establish that the def endant has derived a commercial benefit from the familiarity of his mark by demonstrating a linkage with the famous mark through use of a similar or identical sign. (Horton 2011:550). The art.5.2/ art.9 (1) (c) was related by CJEU in their verdict and stated that a trade mark owner can safeguard his mark against any misuse whenever there is chance for infringement but also can proceed against the defendant when the mark’s other features are impacted like any warranty of the quality of the products or services and those of advertisement, communications and investment.